Zhuzhou men spend 110 thousand to buy a second-hand car over the murder of ” ” refused to sayu-02

  • hanson
  • November 18, 2017
  • Home Products & Services
  • Comments Off on Zhuzhou men spend 110 thousand to buy a second-hand car over the murder of ” ” refused to sayu-02

Zhuzhou men spend 110 thousand to buy a second-hand car over the murder of " " refused to retreat [Abstract] Zhuzhou men spend 110 thousand to buy a second-hand car, later known car "homicide case". Man asked to return the car and 3 times compensation, was rejected. Business sector intervention. Reminder: buy second-hand car 4 aspects should pay attention to > > original title: Zhuzhou people spend 110 thousand to buy a second-hand car over the murder of " " refused to retreat home Lusong District Mr. Tang, spent 110 thousand yuan to buy a second-hand car, the result later learned that this car has been "murder". He asked businesses to return the car and compensation, but businesses to be rejected. Yesterday, the business sector involved in the matter to mediate. Car Buying: second-hand car windshield no.inconsistent in May this year, Mr. Tang in the red flag Road, a company called "Sheng Kaiyuan" second-hand car dealers, saw a TOYOTA car. Payment before signing a contract, Mr. Tang to drive, and carefully check the vehicle engine parts etc.. Mr. Tang believes that although the vehicle some small problems, but overall in good condition, the final one-time payment of 110 thousand yuan car, the vehicle for the transfer procedures. In the contract, with businesses indicate the number of kilometers, the vehicle condition, and marked "no major accidents". Car to buy back more than 3 months, there is no problem during. In September 5th, he drove to an auto repair shop to do routine maintenance. Because the air conditioning out some strange smell, Mr. Tang asked to do air conditioning cleaning. "At that time, auto repair master found out below the tuyere depth and console cover have broken glass." Mr. Tang told reporters, auto repair master through further check and found that the number of the front windshield and other pieces of glass no.inconsistent, had been replaced. Proof: the original owner had been driving the death of Mr. Tang trustee inquiry auto insurance records found that the car had an accident in April 2015. To his surprise, the accident caused by vehicles, hit those who died on the spot. "The process of accident insurance loss adjusters, closing, payment, was completed in January this year, when the driver is the original owner." In the opinion of Mr. Tang, driving death should be counted as a major accident, he believes that the car dealer to conceal the truth to him, the existence of fraud. September 9th, Mr. Tang found car dealers, requiring businesses to take back the car and bear the car 3 times the amount of compensation. However, the boss Mr. Chen has to "although the accident occurred, but no major damage to the car itself" on the grounds, refused the request of Mr. tang. Mr. Tang helpless, to seek help from industry and commerce. Mediation: business car return refund, 1000 yuan compensation for lost income yesterday morning, both industrial and commercial personnel organization mediation in the garage. The boss Mr. Chen admitted that in the car, he did not inform Mr. Tang the vehicle had caused the death of people, but for the identification standard of major accident of the vehicle, is the basis to determine the condition itself. The accident, the extent of damage to the vehicle itself did not meet the standard of major accidents, so Mr. Chen believes that there is no fraud. The reporter saw in the contract, identification standard of major accident car agreed a total of 6, including the A B C column and the above damage or deformation, the longitudinal beam before or after damage, while retaining.相关的主题文章: